Skip to content
Browsing as a guest. Create a free account to post, comment, and join the conversation. Log inCreate free account
Sign in
Y
Post your reply…
Reply
Replies (6)
alsancle avatar
· Sep 16
There should be a 25 year or 30 year rolling exemption.  There are so few of those cars and it is so hard and onerous to take parts.   Also, the few that exist are not being driven 20k miles a year.
ChandlerFan1929 avatar
· Sep 16
i support this idea.
prewarnut avatar
· Sep 16
It's odd it rolls for a few years and then stops....I know any year is arbitrary but I wonder if it would make sense to run it forward until 1996 with the adoption of OBDII....
Ralph71 avatar
· Sep 16
@prewarnut the signed version is watered down and is very different from the original.  The  original proposed law had a rolling year and was much more reasonable.   But I guess anything is better than nothing.
Hupp31 avatar
· Sep 17
I agree. If not a 25 year exemption, the OBDII  introduction would be a logical cutoff. What they ended up with seems like much ado about nothing.
alsancle avatar
· Sep 17
I guess this is better than nothing?